Thursday, March 21, 2019
Speak Your Mind: The Censorship Controversy In American Culture :: essays research papers fc
On a rainy morning in Detroit, Michigan, a twenty-something year old reality by the name of Marshall Mathers awakes to hear a pounding on his front door. After muttering a few obscene phrases, he rolls out of bed and stumbles to his front door. However, instead of facing another code seeker, the rapper best known by his alias Eminem (or the real bring down Shady) is aspect to face with two police officers. Mr. Mathers, virtuoso says, were here to serve you with an arrest warrant. You do subjected much of Americas world to obscenity, homophobic comments, sexism, and racism, and frankly, it offends some people. We dont want culture to face your type of commentary any more. You have the right to remain reticent Needless to say, this scenario would never occur in the Ameri croup democracy of the present. However, some in America today are advocating security review to such an utmost(prenominal) that someday events such as this may become a reality. And, though time and time again court cases have ruled against censorship, many continue to fight to limit free speech in America. However, in restraining what the constitution guarantees, there is much at stake. Although many argue that censorship is necessary to protect Americas citizens, it violates ones immunity of speech found in the First Amendment and should therefore not be practiced.Granted, there are many reasons for advocating censorship that could be justified. Much solid that is available in magazines, at the movie theater, and on the internet is considered by many to be extremely offensive. For example, the rock band Rage Against the political machine at times seems to glorify violence. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, the Columbine High School gunmen, were sensitive of this band, and some of Rage Against the Machines lyrics have been assumed to have inspired the boys violent act. In many cases, evil can be advocated in forms of speech, causing many to believe that in order to foreclose wron g from prevailing, censorship must be practiced with a fervor. In his essay Censorship Can Be Beneficial, Thomas Stork says, Now if we can identify certain evils, and if advocacy of those evils seems likely to encourage people to ordain them, then why should we not take the next and logical whole step and prohibit such advocacy Must the authorities be confounded to restrain the source of the evil? (20) This statement is a logical one, for one of the American governments greatest concerns is protecting its citizens from violent acts.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment