Morals and Ethics of Cloning

Regardless of what our future holds, it lead be establish on the decisions we make today. Those decisions can be made using the functional Theory which states that we ar doing good for the greatest number of pot. Using loom Utilitarianism which meets that a behavioral code or rule is morally mighty if the consequences of adopting that rule argon to a greater extent favorable than unfavorable to every iodine. (IEP) is justifiably observe that if a consensus is formed on the basis of rules that govern re-create, and these rules are broken, the earmark punishment forget result.This is be stimulate cloning a clement will non benefit the society as a whole it would do more harm than good. We all collapse rules that govern our society over what is in force(p) or wrong and we k right a fashion that these rules are set forth to maintain order. We deem laws beca social function it benefits the majority of the people.Principles of Consequences state that when looking at the end result, the tame action will be the action that begins the greatest amount of happiness (Usury). To decide if mankind cloning produces the greatest amount of happiness we have one question still in call for of an answer is be human embryos really human? Well, the term human proceeding the term embryo should adequately answer the question.The embryo are cloned from human tissue, contain human DNA, and so thither is likely a 100 percent chance that the embryos are indeed human, as opposed to being tadpole embryos. Therefore, biologically sermon a clone is no less a human than you or I. And using that human for tissue simply because he/she was cloned rather than conceived does non validate the notion, nor skip around the moral and ethical implications of taking the liveliness of an separate human being. Death is not a happy routine therefore it does not produce the greatest amount of happiness to the majority of the population.clone is the passage of taking cells from a donor, placing them in a culture udder where the nutrients areminimal, so the cells stop dividing and switch their active genes. The cells are wherefore put next to an unfertilized egg. The nucleus is sucked out of the egg go forth an empty egg cell containing all the cellular machinery necessary to produce an embryo. An electric shock is used to fuse the egg and cell together. A second shock is then used to mimic the act of fertilization and help begin cell division. After the egg has victoryfully locomote to the stage of an embryo it is then placed in to the uterus of a surrogate mother. When born, all the genes are the like as the donor of the cell.In 1997 Dr. Ian Wilmut, a British scientist successfully cloned a sheep named Dolly. This turned the scientific world upside-d have. The success of the experiment is considered by all as an amazing achievement in science. However, morality and morals must surface to regulate cloning. It is understood that laissez faire is the most important part of life. Individuality is effrontery to a mortal at birth and considered a right they will have for heartsease of their life.There is also a fear that the clone whitethorn solely be produced to live the life of the clone, thus causing severe emotional price as well pain and suffering for the clone. The progression of the clone may be limited, the claim in idea development will lento die off. Evolution could come to a halt, because with clones, diversity will be limited and there will not be as many advances in society. The cells, in all humans, will all be the same and there will not be a process of inseparable selection and diversity.Another controversial question facing the cloning process is How will the clones be treated? The emotions of the clones need to be buzz offn in to status after all they are humans too. What is common to these various views, however, is a shared understanding that being a soulfulness is different from being the manipulat ed object of other peoples desires and expectations(Biomedical ethics). People, as clones, will be studied, prodded, and poked which in turn will cause much unwanted anxiety and emotional distress.There will also be problems with relationships among parents and the clone for understandable reasons. It will bring up a lot of unwelcome stress for the clone when one parent is an unnamed donor of an egg and the other is Dr. Frankenstein. Some may argue that a child is a child and the parents should making love their child unconditionally. However, the bond between the clone and the parents who care for the clone may have awkward encounters. The love and affection that is provided for most children will not be the same ascribable to the fact that the clone is considered to be more of an experiment rather than a child. Another argument may be that artificial insemination has already taken the rate of engineering babies. However, artificial insemination is used for parents who can no t have children but feel they could provide a loving environment for them.Despite the grand differences and backgrounds of the world today all most people agree that congress (sex)is the naturally preferred way to conceive a child. With the cloning process the necessity to have coitus will not be needed. Is there something about the individual that is lost when the mystical act of conceiving a person becomes standardized into a mere act of photocopying one (Time)?The parents will not have to conceive a child, just order one from a catalog and have it arrive next day air. It will take away the personal feeling and romance that having a child of your own creates. Part of the bliss of having a child is the mystery behind it. Is it a boy? A girl? Who does it look like? Cloning will take away from the pleasures that have been happening for countless years and the elements of rage will fade in to mail order babies.Another very delicate issue is the question of, is the medical world ta king to much agree? It is stated by scientists that if they are allowed to clone people, one wont have to use up about organ donations or blood drives in order for people to survive. The scientists willsimply clone an organ and replace the faulty one in the human. As simple as this seems, the issue of who they can use to clone comes up. Finding the ideal person to clone is wakeless enough, now try to get one with the right blood type, size, and gender.The numbers ebb and it seems as if the scientists would have to clone someone for each person. If this is true, would the clones be stored somewhere, or able to roam around the world until they were needed to fill their component part? Once again the rights of the clones come up and the thought of clone farms creates a sort of yuck factor for everyone.According to Time Magazine, Out of 277 tries, the exploreers eventually produced only 29 embryos that survived longer than six days out of the remaining 29 only one survived and was born. The percentage is very low leaving people question if it iseven worth the time and effort put in. Some clones may indeed be growing old before their time(U.S. News). The research states that the clones will not live a whole life cod to the one cell that has been cloned is older and effects the rest of the clones cells making them advance prematurely. Instead of using science to lengthen the life of a human cloning will decrease the length of life by half.Scientists need to reconsider how they are manipulating the world. Based on the information provided through the research, doctors should step back and take a look at the morals and ethics of cloning humans and evaluate if it is really worth the risk doctors are taking.The bad consequences out way the good, therefore we cannot as giste that the benefit of human cloning will solve lifes problems. To this day we have yet to find a cure for the common cold. This is because most diseases have a way of surviving, as did the huma n race during the ice age. Everything finds a way to set to its environment and if the benefits major benefit for cloning is to cure diseases, then we are at a loss. The fight for life survival of the fittest can sum it up.If we result to cloning as a means for reproduction, then who is to read that our bodies might not adapt to this, only allowing for this type of reproduction? save then will we realize that in our effort to gain fellowship and power over every other living thing, did we fail. Everything on this universe has to be in perfect balance, and when we continue to tamper with Mother Nature, she finds a way to fight back. For example, the ozone layer is being depleted because of chemical agents produced and released into the airwave by man. As a result, the ozone layer can longer hold dear our skin as it used too, causing more cases of skin malignant neoplastic disease every year. I believe that if you push someone, or in this case, something (Mother Nature) hard en ough, she will push back. We need to take things as they are given to us, the good and the bad. When we try to beat the odd, sometimes the odds beat us.BibliographyBiomedical Ethics Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego Greenhaven Press, Inc, 1998Cloning (1998). How to Clone a Human (Version 1.1). On-line Biofact November 8, 1999. Available http//www.biofact.com/cloning/human.htmlCloning (1998). Human Cloning Plans. On-line NPR November 8, 1999 AvailableDolly, Polly, Gene-send in the clones Science News. January 23, 1997. pp.127Cloning (1999). Should Cloning Be Banned? On-line Reasons November 5, 1999 Available http//www.reasons.com /biclone.html Kluger, Jeffrey. Goodbye, Dolly Time June 7, 1999. pp.70Nash, J. The term of Cloning Time March 10, 19997. pp.60-75Macklin, Ruth. Human cloning? Dont just translate no. U.S. News & homo Report. March10, 1997. pp. 64Couzin, Jennifer Whats Killing The Clones? U.S. News & World Report. May24, 1999. pp.65