Briefing The Case

TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTS requester Leegin Creative Leather Products , a manufacturer of women s accessories under the soil name Brighton , entered into a undecomposed minimum worth agreements with its retailer , which includes herein respondent , PSKS , Inc . suitor avers that such harm agreements consider to encourage com request among retailers in the areas of customer service and reaping promotion . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their positivistic minimum determine . later being dropped by Leegin as one of its retailers , PSKS d a lawsuit , arguing that Leegin violates subdivision 1 of the Sherman Act by engaging in anticompetitive hurt fixing . The District judiciary decided in estimate of PSKS citing Dr . Miles Medical Co . v . John D . approximate range Sons Co , which held that mandate price agreements are per se vile under the Sherman Act . suer , in an appeal to the U .S .

Court of Appeals for the Fifth tour , argued that this find out was based on outdated economics and contended that a the rule of reason is a better legal psychoanalysis Petitioner further claimed that price minimums will only be held illicit when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court rule in favor of the regulate court hence , this supplicant for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to treated mandatary minimum prices for its productsRULENo , it is not illegal for a manufacturer to mystify mandatory minimum prices for its products . plane section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very sequel , combination in...If you want to become a full essay, gear up it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper